1994 Bristol Blenheim vs. 1982 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1994 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,030 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 164 kg more than 1994 Bristol Blenheim.
Because 1994 Bristol Blenheim is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Bristol Blenheim. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Bristol Blenheim | 1982 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
Model | Blenheim | DeVille |
Year Released | 1994 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 6030 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1746 kg | 1910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3090 mm |