1994 Bristol Blenheim vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1994 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1994 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Bristol Blenheim weights approximately 420 kg more than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1994 Bristol Blenheim is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Bristol Blenheim. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Bristol Blenheim | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Bristol | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Blenheim | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1994 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5898 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1746 kg | 1326 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2680 mm |
