1994 Bugatti EB 110 vs. 2005 Chrysler Crossfire
To start off, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Bugatti EB 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Bugatti EB 110 would be higher. At 3,498 cc (12 cylinders), 1994 Bugatti EB 110 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Bugatti EB 110 (600 HP) has 260 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler Crossfire. (340 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Bugatti EB 110 should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler Crossfire. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Bugatti EB 110 weights approximately 25 kg more than 2005 Chrysler Crossfire. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1994 Bugatti EB 110 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Chrysler Crossfire. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Bugatti EB 110 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Bugatti EB 110 (864 Nm) has 444 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler Crossfire. (420 Nm). This means 1994 Bugatti EB 110 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler Crossfire.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Bugatti EB 110 | 2005 Chrysler Crossfire | |
Make | Bugatti | Chrysler |
Model | EB 110 | Crossfire |
Year Released | 1994 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3498 cc | 3195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 600 HP | 340 HP |
Torque | 864 Nm | 420 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81.4 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 56.6 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.7:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1535 kg | 1510 kg |