1994 Buick Regal vs. 1956 Ford Zodiac
To start off, 1994 Buick Regal is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Buick Regal is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Buick Regal weights approximately 152 kg more than 1956 Ford Zodiac.
Because 1956 Ford Zodiac is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Ford Zodiac. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Buick Regal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Buick Regal | 1956 Ford Zodiac | |
| Make | Buick | Ford |
| Model | Regal | Zodiac |
| Year Released | 1994 | 1956 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2844 cc | 2552 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 76 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1344 kg | 1192 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2720 mm |
