1994 Buick Regal vs. 1963 Rover 2000
To start off, 1994 Buick Regal is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Buick Regal is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Buick Regal weights approximately 132 kg more than 1963 Rover 2000.
Because 1963 Rover 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Rover 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Buick Regal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Buick Regal | 1963 Rover 2000 | |
| Make | Buick | Rover |
| Model | Regal | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1994 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2844 cc | 1978 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 91 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1344 kg | 1212 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2630 mm |
