1994 Buick Regal vs. 2002 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2002 Jeep Compass is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Buick Regal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Buick Regal would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jeep Compass weights approximately 62 kg more than 1994 Buick Regal.
Because 2002 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Buick Regal. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Buick Regal | 2002 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Buick | Jeep |
Model | Regal | Compass |
Year Released | 1994 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 210 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1344 kg | 1406 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2660 mm |