1994 Buick Regal vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Buick Regal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Buick Regal would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Buick Regal is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Buick Regal weights approximately 210 kg more than 2006 Mazda 3.
Because 2006 Mazda 3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mazda 3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Buick Regal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Buick Regal | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Buick | Mazda |
| Model | Regal | 3 |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2844 cc | 1998 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 139 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1344 kg | 1134 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2650 mm |
