1994 Buick Roadmaster vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1994 Buick Roadmaster is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 5,732 cc (8 cylinders), 1994 Buick Roadmaster is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Buick Roadmaster (256 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Buick Roadmaster should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Buick Roadmaster weights approximately 900 kg more than 1966 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1994 Buick Roadmaster (447 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 289 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1994 Buick Roadmaster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Buick Roadmaster | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Buick | Triumph |
Model | Roadmaster | 2000 |
Year Released | 1994 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5732 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 256 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 447 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2070 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5540 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2700 mm |