1994 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 2012 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2012 Fisker Karma is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Fisker Karma weights approximately 830 kg more than 1994 Cadillac Eldorado.
Because 2012 Fisker Karma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Fisker Karma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Cadillac Eldorado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Cadillac Eldorado | 2012 Fisker Karma | |
| Make | Cadillac | Fisker |
| Model | Eldorado | Karma |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1710 kg | 2540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1331 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3160 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 36 L |
