1994 Caterham Seven vs. 1963 Volvo 120
To start off, 1994 Caterham Seven is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 1994 Caterham Seven is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Caterham Seven (165 HP) has 98 more horse power than 1963 Volvo 120. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Caterham Seven should accelerate faster than 1963 Volvo 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Volvo 120 weights approximately 470 kg more than 1994 Caterham Seven.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Caterham Seven (203 Nm) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Volvo 120. (144 Nm). This means 1994 Caterham Seven will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Volvo 120.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Caterham Seven | 1963 Volvo 120 | |
| Make | Caterham | Volvo |
| Model | Seven | 120 |
| Year Released | 1994 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1778 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 165 HP | 67 HP |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 540 kg | 1010 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2610 mm |
