1994 Caterham Seven vs. 1964 Mini MK I
To start off, 1994 Caterham Seven is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Mini MK I would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 1994 Caterham Seven is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Caterham Seven (165 HP) has 131 more horse power than 1964 Mini MK I. (34 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Caterham Seven should accelerate faster than 1964 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Mini MK I weights approximately 78 kg more than 1994 Caterham Seven.
Because 1994 Caterham Seven is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Caterham Seven. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Mini MK I, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Caterham Seven (203 Nm) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Mini MK I. (60 Nm). This means 1994 Caterham Seven will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Caterham Seven | 1964 Mini MK I | |
Make | Caterham | Mini |
Model | Seven | MK I |
Year Released | 1994 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 848 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 34 HP |
Torque | 203 Nm | 60 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 540 kg | 618 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2040 mm |