1994 Caterham Seven vs. 1967 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 1994 Caterham Seven is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,738 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Sunbeam Tiger (197 HP) has 32 more horse power than 1994 Caterham Seven. (165 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 1994 Caterham Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Sunbeam Tiger weights approximately 600 kg more than 1994 Caterham Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Caterham Seven | 1967 Sunbeam Tiger | |
| Make | Caterham | Sunbeam |
| Model | Seven | Tiger |
| Year Released | 1994 | 1967 |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 4738 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 165 HP | 197 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 540 kg | 1140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2190 mm |
