1994 Caterham Seven vs. 1968 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 1994 Caterham Seven is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Caterham Seven (165 HP) has 106 more horse power than 1968 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Caterham Seven should accelerate faster than 1968 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 490 kg more than 1994 Caterham Seven.
Because 1968 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Caterham Seven. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Caterham Seven (203 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm). This means 1994 Caterham Seven will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Caterham Seven | 1968 Jeep CJ5 | |
| Make | Caterham | Jeep |
| Model | Seven | CJ5 |
| Year Released | 1994 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2199 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 165 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 540 kg | 1030 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 3520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2060 mm |
