1994 Caterham Seven vs. 1982 Suzuki Cervo
To start off, 1994 Caterham Seven is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Suzuki Cervo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Suzuki Cervo would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 1994 Caterham Seven is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Caterham Seven (165 HP) has 139 more horse power than 1982 Suzuki Cervo. (26 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Caterham Seven should accelerate faster than 1982 Suzuki Cervo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Caterham Seven weights approximately 5 kg more than 1982 Suzuki Cervo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Caterham Seven (203 Nm) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Suzuki Cervo. (52 Nm). This means 1994 Caterham Seven will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Suzuki Cervo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Caterham Seven | 1982 Suzuki Cervo | |
| Make | Caterham | Suzuki |
| Model | Seven | Cervo |
| Year Released | 1994 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 538 cc |
| Horse Power | 165 HP | 26 HP |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 52 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 540 kg | 535 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 3200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1400 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1220 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2040 mm |
