1994 Caterham Seven vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 1998 Renault Clio is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Caterham Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Caterham Seven would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Renault Clio weights approximately 395 kg more than 1994 Caterham Seven.
Because 1994 Caterham Seven is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Caterham Seven. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Caterham Seven | 1998 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Caterham | Renault |
| Model | Seven | Clio |
| Year Released | 1994 | 1998 |
| Horse Power | 165 HP | 0 HP |
| Top Speed | 194 km/hour | 181 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 540 kg | 935 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2770 mm |
