1994 Caterham Seven vs. 2000 Chrysler Sebring
To start off, 2000 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Caterham Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Caterham Seven would be higher. At 2,425 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 840 kg more than 1994 Caterham Seven.
Because 1994 Caterham Seven is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Caterham Seven. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Caterham Seven | 2000 Chrysler Sebring | |
Make | Caterham | Chrysler |
Model | Seven | Sebring |
Year Released | 1994 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2425 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 540 kg | 1380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2640 mm |