1994 Caterham Seven vs. 2001 Mazda B2500
To start off, 2001 Mazda B2500 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Caterham Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Caterham Seven would be higher. At 2,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Mazda B2500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Caterham Seven (165 HP) has 83 more horse power than 2001 Mazda B2500. (82 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Caterham Seven should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda B2500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda B2500 weights approximately 1200 kg more than 1994 Caterham Seven.
Because 2001 Mazda B2500 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Caterham Seven. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda B2500 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Caterham Seven (203 Nm) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda B2500. (194 Nm). This means 1994 Caterham Seven will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda B2500.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Caterham Seven | 2001 Mazda B2500 | |
| Make | Caterham | Mazda |
| Model | Seven | B2500 |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2497 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 165 HP | 82 HP |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 194 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 540 kg | 1740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 5010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2990 mm |
