1994 Caterham Seven vs. 2002 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2002 Dodge Dakota is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Caterham Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Caterham Seven would be higher. At 2,458 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Caterham Seven (165 HP) has 47 more horse power than 2002 Dodge Dakota. (118 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Caterham Seven should accelerate faster than 2002 Dodge Dakota. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 996 kg more than 1994 Caterham Seven.
Because 2002 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Caterham Seven. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Caterham Seven (203 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Dodge Dakota. (196 Nm). This means 1994 Caterham Seven will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Dodge Dakota.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Caterham Seven | 2002 Dodge Dakota | |
| Make | Caterham | Dodge |
| Model | Seven | Dakota |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2458 cc |
| Horse Power | 165 HP | 118 HP |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 196 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 540 kg | 1536 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4980 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2850 mm |
