1994 Caterham Seven vs. 2002 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 2002 Jaguar XJR is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Caterham Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Caterham Seven would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJR (390 HP) has 225 more horse power than 1994 Caterham Seven. (165 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 1994 Caterham Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 1125 kg more than 1994 Caterham Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJR (525 Nm) has 322 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Caterham Seven. (203 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Caterham Seven. 2002 Jaguar XJR has automatic transmission and 1994 Caterham Seven has manual transmission. 1994 Caterham Seven will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Jaguar XJR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Caterham Seven | 2002 Jaguar XJR | |
Make | Caterham | Jaguar |
Model | Seven | XJR |
Year Released | 1994 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 4196 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 390 HP |
Torque | 203 Nm | 525 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86.1 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.1 mm | 90.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.1:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 540 kg | 1665 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2910 mm |