1994 Caterham Seven vs. 2004 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2004 Mazda Tribute is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Caterham Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Caterham Seven would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda Tribute (201 HP) has 36 more horse power than 1994 Caterham Seven. (165 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1994 Caterham Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 966 kg more than 1994 Caterham Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda Tribute (266 Nm) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Caterham Seven. (203 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Caterham Seven.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Caterham Seven | 2004 Mazda Tribute | |
| Make | Caterham | Mazda |
| Model | Seven | Tribute |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2966 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 165 HP | 201 HP |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 266 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 540 kg | 1506 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2630 mm |
