1994 Caterham Seven vs. 2006 Mazda 5
To start off, 2006 Mazda 5 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Caterham Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Caterham Seven would be higher. At 2,262 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Caterham Seven (165 HP) has 8 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 5. (157 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Caterham Seven should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 5.
Because 1994 Caterham Seven is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Caterham Seven. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Caterham Seven (203 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 5. (201 Nm). This means 1994 Caterham Seven will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 5.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Caterham Seven | 2006 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Caterham | Mazda |
Model | Seven | 5 |
Year Released | 1994 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2262 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 157 HP |
Torque | 203 Nm | 201 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2760 mm |