1994 Caterham Seven vs. 2008 Volvo S60
To start off, 2008 Volvo S60 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Caterham Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Caterham Seven would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2008 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volvo S60 weights approximately 994 kg more than 1994 Caterham Seven.
Because 1994 Caterham Seven is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Caterham Seven. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Volvo S60 (286 Nm) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Caterham Seven. (203 Nm). This means 2008 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Caterham Seven.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Caterham Seven | 2008 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Caterham | Volvo |
Model | Seven | S60 |
Year Released | 1994 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2435 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 203 Nm | 286 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86.1 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.1 mm | 90 mm |
Top Speed | 194 km/hour | 230 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 540 kg | 1534 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2720 mm |