1994 Caterham Seven vs. 2011 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2011 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Caterham Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Caterham Seven would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 1994 Caterham Seven is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP) has 67 more horse power than 1994 Caterham Seven. (165 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1994 Caterham Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 850 kg more than 1994 Caterham Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mazda RX-8 (215 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Caterham Seven. (203 Nm). This means 2011 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Caterham Seven.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Caterham Seven | 2011 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Caterham | Mazda |
Model | Seven | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1994 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1300 cc |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 232 HP |
Torque | 203 Nm | 215 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 540 kg | 1390 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1341 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2703 mm |