1994 Caterham Seven vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Caterham Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Caterham Seven would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (266 HP) has 101 more horse power than 1994 Caterham Seven. (165 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1994 Caterham Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1281 kg more than 1994 Caterham Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS (302 Nm) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Caterham Seven. (203 Nm). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Caterham Seven. 2013 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 1994 Caterham Seven has manual transmission. 1994 Caterham Seven will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1994 Caterham Seven 2013 Cadillac CTS
Make Caterham Cadillac
Model Seven CTS
Year Released 1994 2013
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1998 cc 3000 cc
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 165 HP 266 HP
Torque 203 Nm 302 Nm
Engine Bore Size 86.1 mm 89 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86.1 mm 80 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.5:1 11.7
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 540 kg 1821 kg
Vehicle Length 3400 mm 4877 mm
Vehicle Width 1580 mm 1842 mm
Vehicle Height 1090 mm 1473 mm
Wheelbase Size 2240 mm 2880 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]