1994 Chevrolet Astro vs. 2000 Matra-Simca M72
To start off, 2000 Matra-Simca M72 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Chevrolet Astro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Chevrolet Astro would be higher. In terms of performance, 1994 Chevrolet Astro (183 HP) has 133 more horse power than 2000 Matra-Simca M72. (50 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 2000 Matra-Simca M72.
Because 1994 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Matra-Simca M72. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Matra-Simca M72 has automatic transmission and 1994 Chevrolet Astro has manual transmission. 1994 Chevrolet Astro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Matra-Simca M72 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Chevrolet Astro | 2000 Matra-Simca M72 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Matra-Simca |
Model | Astro | M72 |
Year Released | 1994 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Horse Power | 183 HP | 50 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 2 seats |