1994 Chevrolet Astro vs. 2002 Toyota F-1
To start off, 2002 Toyota F-1 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Chevrolet Astro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Chevrolet Astro would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 183 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 285 kg more than 2002 Toyota F-1.
Because 1994 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Toyota F-1. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Toyota F-1 (430 Nm) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Chevrolet Astro. (338 Nm). This means 2002 Toyota F-1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Chevrolet Astro.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Chevrolet Astro | 2002 Toyota F-1 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
| Model | Astro | F-1 |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4293 cc | 2998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 183 HP | 183 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 338 Nm | 430 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1895 kg | 1610 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2710 mm |
