1994 Chevrolet Astro vs. 2005 Mazda 6

To start off, 2005 Mazda 6 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Chevrolet Astro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Chevrolet Astro would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Chevrolet Astro (183 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 2005 Mazda 6. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 550 kg more than 2005 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1994 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Chevrolet Astro (338 Nm) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda 6. (244 Nm). This means 1994 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda 6.

Compare all specifications: