1994 Chevrolet Astro vs. 2010 Mazda 3

To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Chevrolet Astro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Chevrolet Astro would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Chevrolet Astro (183 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 2010 Mazda 3. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda 3.

Because 1994 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Chevrolet Astro (338 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mazda 3. (145 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1994 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mazda 3.

Compare all specifications:

1994 Chevrolet Astro 2010 Mazda 3
Make Chevrolet Mazda
Model Astro 3
Year Released 1994 2010
Body Type Minivan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4293 cc 1560 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 183 HP 104 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 338 Nm 145 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 4500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Front
Transmission Type Manual 5-speed manual
Number of Seats 8 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 4830 mm 4590 mm
Vehicle Width 1980 mm 1755 mm
Vehicle Height 1910 mm 1471 mm
Wheelbase Size 2830 mm 2639 mm