1994 Chevrolet Astro vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Chevrolet Astro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Chevrolet Astro would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 57 more horse power than 1994 Chevrolet Astro. (183 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1994 Chevrolet Astro.
Because 1994 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Chevrolet Astro (338 Nm) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 1994 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Chevrolet Astro | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
| Model | Astro | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4293 cc | 2564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 183 HP | 240 HP |
| Torque | 338 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
