1994 Chevrolet Astro vs. 2012 Honda Civic
To start off, 2012 Honda Civic is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Chevrolet Astro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Chevrolet Astro would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Chevrolet Astro (183 HP) has 45 more horse power than 2012 Honda Civic. (138 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 2012 Honda Civic.
Because 1994 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Honda Civic. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Chevrolet Astro (338 Nm) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Honda Civic. (174 Nm). This means 1994 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Honda Civic.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Chevrolet Astro | 2012 Honda Civic | |
Make | Chevrolet | Honda |
Model | Astro | Civic |
Year Released | 1994 | 2012 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4293 cc | 1799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 183 HP | 138 HP |
Torque | 338 Nm | 174 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1785 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1460 mm |