1994 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2003 Smart Roadster
To start off, 2003 Smart Roadster is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Chevrolet Blazer (158 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 2003 Smart Roadster. (100 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 2003 Smart Roadster.
Because 1994 Chevrolet Blazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Smart Roadster. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Chevrolet Blazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Chevrolet Blazer (312 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Smart Roadster. (130 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1994 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Smart Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Chevrolet Blazer | 2003 Smart Roadster | |
Make | Chevrolet | Smart |
Model | Blazer | Roadster |
Year Released | 1994 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4300 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 130 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2370 mm |