1994 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1966 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 1994 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 3,391 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Chevrolet Camaro (158 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 747 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Chevrolet Camaro | 1966 DAF Daffodil | |
| Make | Chevrolet | DAF |
| Model | Camaro | Daffodil |
| Year Released | 1994 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3391 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 26 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1413 kg | 666 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 33 L |
