1994 Chevrolet Cavalier vs. 1968 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1994 Chevrolet Cavalier is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,190 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Chevrolet Cavalier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Chevrolet Cavalier (120 HP) has 26 more horse power than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. (94 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Chevrolet Cavalier should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Chevrolet Cavalier weights approximately 247 kg more than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Chevrolet Cavalier, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Chevrolet Cavalier (176 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1994 Chevrolet Cavalier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Chevrolet Cavalier | 1968 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Cavalier | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1994 | 1968 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2190 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 94 HP |
Torque | 176 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.4:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 57 L |