1994 Chevrolet Cavalier vs. 2003 Ford GT

To start off, 2003 Ford GT is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Chevrolet Cavalier. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Chevrolet Cavalier would be higher. At 5,409 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford GT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford GT (493 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 373 more horse power than 1994 Chevrolet Cavalier. (120 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford GT should accelerate faster than 1994 Chevrolet Cavalier. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford GT weights approximately 306 kg more than 1994 Chevrolet Cavalier. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2003 Ford GT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Ford GT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Chevrolet Cavalier, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford GT (678 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 502 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Chevrolet Cavalier. (176 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Ford GT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Chevrolet Cavalier.

Compare all specifications:

1994 Chevrolet Cavalier 2003 Ford GT
Make Chevrolet Ford
Model Cavalier GT
Year Released 1994 2003
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2190 cc 5409 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 120 HP 493 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 176 Nm 678 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 89 mm 90.2 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88 mm 105.8 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 8.4:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1214 kg 1520 kg
Vehicle Length 4590 mm 4650 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1960 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1130 mm
Wheelbase Size 2650 mm 2490 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 57 L 66 L