1994 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2002 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2002 Volvo XC90 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 6,276 cc (8 cylinders), 1994 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 391 kg more than 2002 Volvo XC90.
Let's talk about torque, 1994 Chevrolet Impala (633 Nm) has 313 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Volvo XC90. (320 Nm). This means 1994 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Volvo XC90.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Chevrolet Impala | 2002 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
| Model | Impala | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6276 cc | 2519 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 197 HP |
| Torque | 633 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1842 kg | 1451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5440 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2860 mm |
