1994 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 6,276 cc (8 cylinders), 1994 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 1062 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2.
Let's talk about torque, 1994 Chevrolet Impala (633 Nm) has 570 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru R2. (63 Nm). This means 1994 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru R2. 1994 Chevrolet Impala has automatic transmission and 2003 Subaru R2 has manual transmission. 2003 Subaru R2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1994 Chevrolet Impala will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Chevrolet Impala | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Subaru |
Model | Impala | R2 |
Year Released | 1994 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6276 cc | 658 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 52 HP |
Torque | 633 Nm | 63 Nm |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1842 kg | 780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5440 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2370 mm |