1994 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2009 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 6,276 cc (8 cylinders), 1994 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 662 kg more than 2009 Mazda CX-9.
Let's talk about torque, 1994 Chevrolet Impala (633 Nm) has 267 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda CX-9. (366 Nm). This means 1994 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda CX-9.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Chevrolet Impala | 2009 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Impala | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1994 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6276 cc | 3724 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 273 HP |
Torque | 633 Nm | 366 Nm |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1842 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5440 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2880 mm |