1994 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2010 Honda Fit
To start off, 2010 Honda Fit is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 6,276 cc (8 cylinders), 1994 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 713 kg more than 2010 Honda Fit.
Let's talk about torque, 1994 Chevrolet Impala (633 Nm) has 489 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Honda Fit. (144 Nm). This means 1994 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Honda Fit. 1994 Chevrolet Impala has automatic transmission and 2010 Honda Fit has manual transmission. 2010 Honda Fit will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1994 Chevrolet Impala will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Chevrolet Impala | 2010 Honda Fit | |
Make | Chevrolet | Honda |
Model | Impala | Fit |
Year Released | 1994 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6276 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 117 HP |
Torque | 633 Nm | 144 Nm |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1842 kg | 1129 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5440 mm | 4105 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1694 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1524 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2499 mm |