1994 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 6,276 cc (8 cylinders), 1994 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 72 kg more than 1994 Chevrolet Impala.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V (747 Nm) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Chevrolet Impala. (633 Nm). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Chevrolet Impala. 1994 Chevrolet Impala has automatic transmission and 2013 Cadillac CTS-V has manual transmission. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1994 Chevrolet Impala will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Chevrolet Impala | 2013 Cadillac CTS-V | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Cadillac |
| Model | Impala | CTS-V |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6276 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 548 HP |
| Torque | 633 Nm | 747 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1842 kg | 1914 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5440 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1884 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1422 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2880 mm |
