1994 Chevrolet Lumina vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 1994 Chevrolet Lumina is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Chevrolet Lumina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Chevrolet Lumina (138 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Chevrolet Lumina should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Chevrolet Lumina weights approximately 645 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1994 Chevrolet Lumina (238 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1994 Chevrolet Lumina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Chevrolet Lumina | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Zastava |
| Model | Lumina | 102 |
| Year Released | 1994 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 3135 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 238 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1415 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2160 mm |
