1994 Chrysler Aviat vs. 2000 Smart Roadster
To start off, 2000 Smart Roadster is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Chrysler Aviat. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Chrysler Aviat would be higher. In terms of performance, 1994 Chrysler Aviat (145 HP) has 64 more horse power than 2000 Smart Roadster. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Chrysler Aviat should accelerate faster than 2000 Smart Roadster.
Because 2000 Smart Roadster is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Smart Roadster. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Chrysler Aviat, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1994 Chrysler Aviat has automatic transmission and 2000 Smart Roadster has manual transmission. 2000 Smart Roadster will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1994 Chrysler Aviat will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Chrysler Aviat | 2000 Smart Roadster | |
Make | Chrysler | Smart |
Model | Aviat | Roadster |
Year Released | 1994 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 81 HP |
Top Speed | 196 km/hour | 180 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |