1994 Chrysler Concorde vs. 1968 ZAZ 966
To start off, 1994 Chrysler Concorde is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 3,300 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Chrysler Concorde is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Chrysler Concorde weights approximately 830 kg more than 1968 ZAZ 966.
Because 1968 ZAZ 966 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 ZAZ 966. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Chrysler Concorde, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Chrysler Concorde | 1968 ZAZ 966 | |
Make | Chrysler | ZAZ |
Model | Concorde | 966 |
Year Released | 1994 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3300 cc | 887 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 27 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2170 mm |