1994 Chrysler Concorde vs. 1969 Mazda 1000
To start off, 1994 Chrysler Concorde is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Mazda 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Mazda 1000 would be higher. At 3,300 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Chrysler Concorde is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Chrysler Concorde weights approximately 860 kg more than 1969 Mazda 1000.
Because 1969 Mazda 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Mazda 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Chrysler Concorde, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1994 Chrysler Concorde has automatic transmission and 1969 Mazda 1000 has manual transmission. 1969 Mazda 1000 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1994 Chrysler Concorde will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Chrysler Concorde | 1969 Mazda 1000 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | Concorde | 1000 |
Year Released | 1994 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3300 cc | 987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 49 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2270 mm |