1994 Chrysler Concorde vs. 1982 Ford Telstar
To start off, 1994 Chrysler Concorde is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Telstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Telstar would be higher. At 3,300 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Chrysler Concorde is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Chrysler Concorde weights approximately 540 kg more than 1982 Ford Telstar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Chrysler Concorde | 1982 Ford Telstar | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Concorde | Telstar |
Year Released | 1994 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3300 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 95 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 4390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2520 mm |