1994 Chrysler Concorde vs. 2002 Mazda AZ
To start off, 2002 Mazda AZ is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Chrysler Concorde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Chrysler Concorde would be higher. At 3,300 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Chrysler Concorde is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Chrysler Concorde weights approximately 820 kg more than 2002 Mazda AZ.
Because 2002 Mazda AZ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Chrysler Concorde. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda AZ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1994 Chrysler Concorde has automatic transmission and 2002 Mazda AZ has manual transmission. 2002 Mazda AZ will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1994 Chrysler Concorde will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Chrysler Concorde | 2002 Mazda AZ | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | Concorde | AZ |
Year Released | 1994 | 2002 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3300 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2370 mm |