1994 Chrysler Concorde vs. 2003 Ford Mustang

To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Chrysler Concorde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Chrysler Concorde would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Chrysler Concorde weights approximately 78 kg more than 2003 Ford Mustang.

Because 2003 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Chrysler Concorde, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1994 Chrysler Concorde has automatic transmission and 2003 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 2003 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1994 Chrysler Concorde will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1994 Chrysler Concorde 2003 Ford Mustang
Make Chrysler Ford
Model Concorde Mustang
Year Released 1994 2003
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3300 cc 4601 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 0 HP 400 HP
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1570 kg 1492 kg
Vehicle Length 5120 mm 4630 mm
Vehicle Width 1900 mm 1900 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1300 mm
Wheelbase Size 2880 mm 2490 mm