1994 Chrysler Concorde vs. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Chrysler Concorde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Chrysler Concorde would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 940 kg more than 1994 Chrysler Concorde.
Because 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Chrysler Concorde. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Chrysler Concorde | 2005 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Chrysler | Land Rover |
| Model | Concorde | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3300 cc | 4398 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 282 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 2510 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 4960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2890 mm |
