1994 Chrysler Concorde vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Chrysler Concorde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Chrysler Concorde would be higher. At 3,300 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Chrysler Concorde is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Chrysler Concorde weights approximately 235 kg more than 2008 Renault Clio.
Because 2008 Renault Clio is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Renault Clio. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Chrysler Concorde, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1994 Chrysler Concorde has automatic transmission and 2008 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2008 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1994 Chrysler Concorde will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Chrysler Concorde | 2008 Renault Clio | |
Make | Chrysler | Renault |
Model | Concorde | Clio |
Year Released | 1994 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3300 cc | 2946 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1335 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2520 mm |