1994 Chrysler Concorde vs. 2010 Toyota RAV4
To start off, 2010 Toyota RAV4 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Chrysler Concorde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Chrysler Concorde would be higher. At 3,300 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Chrysler Concorde is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Chrysler Concorde weights approximately 12 kg more than 2010 Toyota RAV4.
Because 2010 Toyota RAV4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Chrysler Concorde. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Toyota RAV4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Chrysler Concorde | 2010 Toyota RAV4 | |
Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
Model | Concorde | RAV4 |
Year Released | 1994 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3300 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 179 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1558 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1854 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2659 mm |