1994 Chrysler Concorde vs. 2012 Mazda 6
To start off, 2012 Mazda 6 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Chrysler Concorde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Chrysler Concorde would be higher. At 3,300 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Chrysler Concorde is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Chrysler Concorde weights approximately 60 kg more than 2012 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Chrysler Concorde | 2012 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | Concorde | 6 |
Year Released | 1994 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3300 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 170 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 4755 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1795 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2789 mm |